منتج النقد السردي الجزائري - دراسة في النقد الروائي الجزائري 1990 م/ 2010 م

Abstract

The great transformations that the Algerian critical discourse underwent in the sixties of the 20th century - that is, after the independence of Algeria - constituted a qualitative leap and a decisive turning point in its trajectories, due to the factor of acculturation with the Oriental Arab University and the scientific and academic tributaries with the European University. The latter was the first motive for the act of transformation by receiving its scientific theories and adopting its arguments in order to keep pace with critical modernity, in particular the new critical research that took place in the eighties- twenty of the last century. Those who produced critical currents with various philosophical visions from structuralism, semiotics, deconstruction, and beyond, because it changed these Western critical theories and currents influenced the Algerian critical study and caused a radical change in its critical structures and in its dominant concepts. On the part of researchers and critics, the product of Algerian criticism has had the best in relation to poetic discourse, alongside the literary scene which has experienced a creative wave and a huge accumulation of fictional art since its first appearance until today. The novel came to represent the literature of the time, and it achieved a high position among literary genres and occupied the forefront of literary writing, which brought it to the attention of its scholars and overwhelm their research. Accordingly, we seek in this study entitled "The product of Algerian narrative criticism:_A study of Algerian narrative criticism 1990-2010" to examine what Algerian critics have achieved in the field of narrative criticism and to trace the paths of their reception of Western critical achievement that emerged in different directions. Particularly in the field of new criticism, and by examining the most distinguished critical models in The Algerian Critical Scene, which contributed to the definition of the critical currents it addressed and the most important questions (objective and technical) that 'she dealt with, following the methodology of critic of criticism in the study.